character building camp?

character building camp.

pffttt.

what a cover-up! after a minister said those things about your camp and also when the whole world had given their say, now you want to say it's a character building camp? that's not what you said the first time the news came out. i read what you said. it wasn't a character building camp. you said it was a camp for effeminate boys!  

that's why i don't read the newspaper so much anymore. one person says that then the next day it turns out to be something different. and sometimes, what's reported on another newspaper is not the same as what has been reported in the other newspaper. reading even major newspapers feels like reading tabloids sometimes. 

newspapers driven by politics. shouldn't the media be un-biased and not take sides? 

i'm entirely confused with the information being circulated around. it's depressing as well because we don't really know the truth. fiction can be real and reality can be fiction. we may never know for sure!

and i want to stress things out, why are only the effeminate boys given the attention? how about girls who behave, dress, look like boys? it's sexist if women face gender-related problems but what if the males were facing the issue, what would you call it? you'd call the male weak. yes. weak. unworthy of being called a man.

i'm not against feminists but c'mon, you don't have guys calling themselves malenists or something. i think being a feminist brings the level of women down somehow, don't you think? i think feminists are sexists too. can i say that? well, feminist is a politically correct term for sexist females i reckon.

but this is beside the point. the point is,

if it was a character building camp, good! then do it annually, please do so. but to come out the first time stating it as a camp for effeminate boys and within days of that statement, you changed, manipulated the information stating, "oh! it's a character-building camp to make the boys feel bla bla bla bla." 

please! if it were indeed a camp to build character, why were the participants made up of boys ONLY? 66 boys to be exact. why not include the girls? now i can call this being sexist. are you implying here that you do not want the girls to proceed further into life or perform better than the boys? 

i think the media, the government too, or anyone in power, should not sugar-coat things in their reports because what's the point of sugar-coating things if it hides the truth? 

and please, do not contradict yourself because at the end of the day, the only person/entity/side that'll be at the shameful receiving end is yours. just stick to the truth and your stance. if you go against yourself, it'll just make you look more pathetic than you already are.

p.s: confused and disturbed. and thoughtful too.